Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)

Stardust (Willie Nelson album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 4, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Country Music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Country MusicTemplate:WikiProject Country MusicCountry Music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stardust (Willie Nelson album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 11:12, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks nice :)! I remember it stubby, but now... another great article

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

ISBN/ISSN check: The short footnote's 13 and the book reference's date are different
Dabsolver check: fixed two dabs
Checklinks check: ok
Reflinks check: ok
Fixed dashes
Do you agree with this edit? I think it was reasonable; if you agree with me, then their rating and refs should be removed.

On hold I give you time to fix these issues.
Pass I changed the date for the Draper Robert short footnotes (1991->1986 as the reference below suggest October 11 1986 as date). Also as a test I found the October 11 Billboard magazine, and looking at the front cover, I think it was the correct magazine and my edit accurate.