This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
What’s the justification to create articles for scientists that have not made a substantial contributions to science or technology? He‘s just a random lobbyist for renewable energy and did not change or enhance scientific knowledge in a substantial way.
I would like to know what contributions Krauter made that justify dedicating an article for him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.104.160 (talk) 10:35, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
3 papers with over 100 citations (according to Google Scholar) suggests that he has contributed significantly to scientific knowledge in his area. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 10:39, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem very significant. I'll start the procedure for deletion proposal. Enalya (talk) 16:16, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
