Talk:Stefanie DeLuca

Notability

On 05:50, 18 January 2018 I wrote the following on User talk:Fyddlestix. @Fyddlestix: was the editor who (rightly at the time) added {notability}:

"Hello, thank you for adding {notability} to Stefanie DeLuca. In hindsight, the article was clearly not ready for primetime when I moved it out of draftspace. I am still relatively new and particularly new when it comes to this type of article. I’m learning that different article types have different notability thresholds.

I have given it a full overhaul. I believe this more detailed article matches or surpasses articles of peers in DeLuca’s field. I believe that, while it may still be a stub, it is now on the Stub-Starter threshold, rather than a deletion candidate, which it admittedly was when you reviewed it. Would you consider giving it a look with an eye toward a removal of the tag in light of the accomplishments described?

Also, if you have any advice, I’m all ears. I’ve learned what little I know from asking folks like yourself.

One fact that I don’t know how to attempt to capture is how cited she is. That alone speaks to the notability of her work. I included the Google Scholar template, which shows her total citations (2500+) and her rather high-end index scores. Is that as far as I should try to go on those points?

Thanks again."

I think maybe I should have posted this message here (as mentioned, still relatively new). I'm hoping to build consensus to see the tag removed after the extensive improvements. Still needs plenty of work but I think the standards for notability are now met.

--Mariefrance (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2018 (UTC)