Talk:Stereotypes of British people

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Neutral Point of View/ Other Issues[edit]

This article is too opinion-based and overall needs some heavy revision. The following are a few of the several problems with this article.

All of the negative stereotypes contain some sort of counterargument, while none of the positive stereotypes are disputed.

"In reality, however, the UK has seen some record-breaking sunny weather as well and also it rains less quantity in London than Sydney or Miami."

The rainfall in Sydney and Miami is irrelevant.

"Tea is seen as a key part of British culture."

This is under the section 'Positive stereotypes', but I do not see a reasoning for why it would be considered 'positive'.

"Football is very popular in the United Kingdom, and has some of the best players in the world."

This is an opinion.

"British people overall are welcoming to people of different nationalities and sexualities." "British people eat a huge variety of dishes from a great wealth of cultures."

Both of these statements are dubious and overgeneralizing.

Again, these are only a few of the large amount of problems and I believe that this article needs a major overhaul in one way or another. There are also several problems that do not involve POV, including, but not limited to, grammar, reliability of sources, formatting, and relevance of material.

Momo824 (talk) 10:54, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's still a work in progress but I have started to address some of the concerns you raised here.Llewee (talk) 21:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think since the very subject of stereotypes of an ethnic group is so subjective, it needs a complete overhaul or else deletion. St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 10:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with my revisions?[edit]

@Snowded: Why did you revert my changes, which were well-sourced? You seem to be trying to make things look worse than they are. St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 12:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well simply stating my reason for reversion in reverse will not make progress. You were bold, you were reverted now make the case for the changes if you think you were right -----Snowded ^TALK 06:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teeth[edit]

This presupposes that the stereotype is based on Americans viewing British teeth as unhealthy. In my experience, it's not based on any assumption of health. Americans (the ones perpetuating the stereotype) just think that it looks bad.

I'll point out, that as it stands, the piece implicitly admits that American and British teeth DO look different; it's not a misperception. (This is contrary to my own personal experience, though; the British that I meet here tend to have teeth as straight and white as Americans.) Drsruli (talk) 14:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How old are the Brits you are meeting? I think the teeth straightening in childhood technology might have started to catch on in the UK in recent decades. Polar Apposite (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 November 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: There is a consensus against move. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stereotypes of the British → Stereotypes of Britain – Article includes a section on Britain's weather which does not relate to the British people 2603:9000:CA02:CACC:6DF0:812:566D:CE0E (talk) 03:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:11, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Britain is too ambiguous. We should keep articles' contents on-topic, rather than change their names to fit whatever someone randomly decides to include. (I've removed that co-called stereotype from the article.) Bazza (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Rather than "Stereotypes of Britain" it should be renamed to Sterotypes of the United Kingdom, the article often points out "UK" rather than "British" which do not mean the same thing, as the UK owns terrritory outside of Britain, and this information would be helpful to include. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spider241 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the climate or geography of a region isn't a stereotype. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Bazza. --The Tips of Apmh 13:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Should Prince be changed to King?[edit]

In the teeth section it mentions King Charles III as 'Prince Charles'. It is talking about an episode of The Simpsons released before his reign, but it doesn't specifically speak in the past tense. Henriio (talk) 08:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Bean is famous, but not necessarily held in high regard.[edit]

Mr. Bean is famous around the world, but I have heard some foreigners say it is low brow humor and a bit of a rip off. Not sure whether Mr. Bean should be said to be a "highly regarded comedy", unlike Fawlty Towers. Maybe it's just successful and lucrative. Mr.Bean and Fawlty Towers really are very different. I've also heard that Mr. Bean is slapstick, and as such is not typically British in style. Polar Apposite (talk) 00:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't particularly like Mr. Bean, but I am not certain if slapstick is the correct term here. It certainly relies of physical comedy, but much of the humor is about an eccentric character who copes with daily life in unusual ways. The series has little to no dialogue, and only one recurring supporting character. There are no major story arcs, or anything resembling character development. Dimadick (talk) 19:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]