Talk:Stockton Street (San Francisco)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

SPUR as a source[edit]

I made some revisions to the sections of this article which were based on a SPUR article from 2012. Because SPUR is an urbanist advocacy group, and as the article (essentially a recap of a SPUR-run visioning session) did not seem to meet encyclopedic standards. I did not remove all references, merely the once which seemed to be almost solely based on conjecture and SPUR's own urbanist slant.

However, I see that the edit was reverted by HaeB as a "factually reliable source." As mentioned above, because SPUR is an advocacy group, I do not believe that this is the case. There are any number of examples where SPUR has presented their opinions on a matter as the only objective fact - and this appears to be another of these cases. If SPUR were an academic organization, I could see an argument for keeping the characterization of the street and its (speculative) future in the article, but given their actual role, I do not think it is appropriate for this venue.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:23, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]