Talk:Storm (Marvel Comics)/GA1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Reassessment[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles' Project quality task force, I am re-reviewing this article to ensure compliance with current good article criteria. I have determined that it doesn't meet criteria for the reasons outlined below and needs a bit of work.
- Lead section does not adequately cover the article content as per WP:LEAD.
- There is a large amount of overlap between #Publication History and #Fictional character biography that should be eliminated; we don't need to hear discussions of her origins and marriage repeatedly (my suggestion is to merge the relevant content into publication history and contextualize it with real-world information.)
- The article is not broad in coverage; there is little in the way of reception information. Even Storm's new-wave punk style is not seriously commented upon. This is a major issue and gap in coverage.
- Small, stubby or otherwise questionable sections: The one-line "Awards" section and the "Bibliography" section, which probably should be axed (its contents are unclear and due to Wikipedia's use of bibliography for sourcing should be renamed in necessary.)
- Multiple citation needed templates throughout.
Due to the amount of issues I am boldly delisting the article. Remember that you can renominate any time you feel it meets criteria. I don't watchlist old reviews, so direct any comments to my talk page. Thanks, --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)