Talk:StorySLAM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 18 August 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) ~ Amkgp 💬 09:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



StorySLAM → Story slam – This kind of event happens outside The Moth and the English-speaking world as well. FörbĂ€tterlig (talk) 08:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2020‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • I think the bigger question is what is this article about. Until your recent edit, the article was solely about the event run by The Moth. All of our sources seem to be about the Moth as well. Story slams as a broader concept may be notable, but I think what would make the most sense would be to return this to being about the specific Moth-run event, and if the broader concept has coverage than have that in a separate page.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • So I guess that would technically be oppose and restore the text to being about the notable event rather than the broader concept.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this article is mainly about the Moth event, but that has to do with the fact that story slam organisers are few and far between. The corresponding Swedish article will also revolve around one organisation/movement. FörbÀtterlig (talk) 20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The article is currently about the Moth events; The wrapping that attempts to generalise it has only one reference which is to a broken link, and should be removed as unsourced. Andrewa (talk) 05:44, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.