Talk:Strategic entry deterrence

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Dr. Espinola-Arredondo's comment on this article[edit]

Dr. Espinola-Arredondo has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

Original: "In business, strategic entry deterrence refers to any action taken by an existing business in a particular market that discourages potential "
Suggested: "In business, strategic entry deterrence refers to any action taken by an existing business in a particular market that seeks to discourage potential"
Original: "leaving any potential entrant with a much smaller space in the market." Suggested: "leaving any potential entrant with a much smaller market share."
"Signalling": Include the paper developed by Milgrom and Roberts (1982), Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information,Econometrica, 50, pp. 443–466 in which they argue that limit pricing can serve as a cost-signaling device to the potential entrants who are uninformed about the cost structure of the incumbent.
In the Signalling section "Signalling needs to be credible to be effective" include the following reference: A. Michael Spence.The Bell Journal of Economics.Vol. 8, No. 2 (Autumn, 1977), pp. 534-544, which argues that entry can be deterred by irreversible investment decisions.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Espinola-Arredondo has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Ana Espinola-Arredondo & Felix Munoz-Garcia, 2011. "The Informative Role of Subsidies," Working Papers 2011-10, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adjustment to the Introduction proposal[edit]

The present introduction feels sluggish and lacks continuity with a some strategies mentioned but then not further elaborated on later in the article and other strategies not mentioned but then discussed later on in the article. Furthermore the credentials for the reference source provide for this information is is questionable as it comes from student tutoring website. Many academics in the field of economics have provide much stronger evidence that should be sourced instead.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwhite1 (talk • contribs) 10:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove "Doomsday Device" Section[edit]

Although this section is informative, the author has provided no references for the source of this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwhite1 (talk • contribs) 10:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove "Signalling section"[edit]

Although this section is informative, the author has not provided any references to support the information