Talk:Strychnos ignatii

Homeopathy

Homeopathic information about this plant required reliable sourcing for inclusion. Please do not include it without a reliable source. Thanks. PouponOnToast (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I think we all need to get together to discuss what articles should have at least a mention of homeopathic use. Depending on where you live, we all know that countless homeopathic remedies sit on shelves or in medicine cabinets all over the world. Mere mention in an article would not be considered "undue weight" or "conflict of interest". As far as I am concerned I don't think that the indications for use should be mentioned. You won't find many docs who like the idea of people treating themselves based on what they have read online. Especially wikipedia. My official take is I think the "most used" (aka polychrest) remedies should have a brief passage along with their other pharmacologic/biologic/other use. I have no interest in discussing whether or not people think it works or how many controlled trials have been conducted. The simple truth is that people use it, and for that reason alone the information should be mentioned here.--travisthurston+ 02:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know nothing about wikipedia, editing and stuff, but maybe if a decnt user stumbles here they can edit this. this is NOT an homeopathic remedy, it's an herbla remedy. Homeopathy relies on dilutions, this is a plant. Homeopathy is not a synonyme for alternative medicine.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:1811:806:2b00:4429:9254:baed:479a (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2015‎ (UTC)

I have removed it; Draft:Nervoheel was recently deleted as not notable enough and quackery. It also appears undue in such a small article. —PaleoNeonate – 02:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Spelling

It's Strychnos ignatii, not S. ignatia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.202.195 (talk) 09:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

I moved the article to the right title. Deli nk (talk) 19:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Strychnos ignatii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110304055156/http://www.enotes.com:80/alternative-medicine-encyclopedia/ignatia to http://www.enotes.com/alternative-medicine-encyclopedia/ignatia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:19, 22 January 2016 (UTC)