Talk:Stuart Island (Washington)

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removed 'Local Projects' section[edit]

I removed a section on local projects that described the local Stuart Island Energy Initiative because, though indisputably cool, it does not meet Wikipedia's standards of notability, and doesn't seem to be intended to benefit the reader so much as benefit the Energy Initiative itself. If anyone wants to talk this out, please feel free to post a message on my userpage. Jtmorgan (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing statement about census information[edit]

The statement in the lead about the 2000 census population is confusing. It states parenthetically that the census data is erroneous, but does not explain the error or attempt to provide a correct figure. Also, the reference link to the census site is broken.

Possibly the issue is most easily resolved by including the 2010 Census figures?W.stanovsky (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]