Talk:Sturgis, Michigan

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Burr Oak Tool and Gauge redirects here[edit]

This article's AFD debate agreed to have the article be merged with this one and have it redirect here. I have done so, and also redirected the talk page here. Johnleemk | Talk 12:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unsupported claim in article[edit]

Anons have repeatedly inserted the text "It is said that Senator Hillary Clinton will walk the parade route this 2007 as she goes on a 1 week campain tour of Michigan. Senator Clinton will have a samll town meeting for those who want to hear what she will do when she becomes President". The claim neither has a verified source to substantiate the claim, nor was I able to find anything to support the claim by reviewing http://www.sturgisjournal.com (the local newspaper's website) or http://www.hillaryclinton.com/ (official Hillary Clinton campaign website).
Due to the unverifiable nature of the post, I suggest removing the claim until/unless WP:VERIFY can be satisfied. --161.88.255.139 21:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that the "fact" tag had been removed without supplying a source, so I re-inserted the tag. The specific weasel-words were removed, so I didn't re-insert that tag. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All your base are belong to us[edit]

This town made national news for it's freak-out over someone posting [signs all over town]. --Bobak 00:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]