Talk:SuperCalc

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SuperCalc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111008163633/http://feigenson.us/blog/?p=10 to http://feigenson.us/blog/?p=10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Release year probably wrong - should be 1981

The year of release is currently listed as 1980. However, I have a photo from May 1981 that I took when I saw a beta version demonstrated on an Osborne 1 (a computer first shipped in production many weeks later in 1981) at the National Computer Conference and it was not complete at the time I spoke with the developers there.

Since that's sort of anecdotal, as backup I refer to the first reference here on this page written by Wally Feigenson, the program's product manager: "SuperCalc was commissioned by Adam Osborn for his first computer..." That would also imply 1981.

See also: "The Birth of SuperCalc" section of the Wikipedia page for Sorcim (apparently written by Wally Feigenson): "The product was introduced in April 1981 at the West Coast Computer Faire in the Osborne booth." ("Introduced" is not the same as "released" -- released is usually later for software from those days.)

I don't see any reasons given for having 1980 as a "released" year, but very strong reasons for 1981.

So, it should be 1981. That is still really early in spreadsheet history and gives SuperCalc the honored place it deserves. I still remember it as the first program similar to VisiCalc after VisiCalc's release, and one that continued to be a major player for years bringing an electronic spreadsheet to many people for the first time. (As co-creator of VisiCalc, released in 1979, I was watching the personal computer software market in those days.)

DanBricklin (talk) 23:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

patent and rights with visicalc?

Wasn't there ever any problem with taking the basic idea from VisiCalc? פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)