Talk:Super Match

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 June 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Football Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Page protected[edit]

Due to an ongoing edit war I have locked this article to prevent editing. Please discuss the issue and try to reach consensus on this talkpage. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why protected this document?[edit]

I created this document and my edit is correct. Super Match was began since 2004, Anyang LG Cheetas location moved to Seoul. Anyang and Seoul are different. Anyang's identity and history are not Seoul's. And team name order is Suwon first, not first Seoul. no use alphabetical order like El Clásico. You consult FIFA website (http://www.fifa.com/classicfootball/stories/classicderby/news/newsid=1085354.html#former+neighbours+forever+foes). You're making a mistake.--Fetx2002 (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fetx, Yunshui did not lock the article to side with one argument. He simply locked the article so that the editors will reach a consensus here first and draft changes so when the article is unlocked the changes that were discussed here can be implemented. The changes you want to add still can be -- as long as you reach an agreement with the other editors rather than edit warring. Mkdw ^talk 23:04, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

exactly, the lock was due to the fact that you and Footwiks are edit warring and had (prior to the lock) not discussed anything here on the talk page. once some level of consensus is reached, the lock will be removed.

I don't think it matters what order the FIFA website lists the teams in, we should list them in alphabetical order. – Pee Jay 05:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Footwiks edit is very subjective and written advantageous for FC Seoul. Footwiks is ruining this document. PeeJay, you consult El Clásico, Osaka derby and fr:Urawa Red Diamonds – Gamba Osaka en football. El Clásico is first Real Madrid, last Barcelona. And Osaka derby is first Gamba Osaka, last Cerezo Osaka.--Fetx2002 (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You must more consult Spartak Moscow–Dinamo Kiev derby, Rubin Kazan–Krylia Sovetov Samara derby, and Seattle Sounders–Portland Timbers rivalry--Fetx2002 (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fetx2002 tell a lie. He also knows that FC seoul and Anyang LG Cheetahs is same club officially. But he don't want to accept it. Because He is Suwon Samsung supporter and He hate FC Seoul. Relocations is not matter.

If the User:Fetx2002's opinion is correct, in other words, Anyang's identity and history are not Seoul's Why is official FC Seoul foundation date 1983? referecnes http://www.kleague.com/clubzone/clubzone_intro.aspx?ccode=K09

Why does start offcial Super Match Records FC Seoul in 1996? referecnes http://www.kleague.com/news/KLeague_news.aspx?search=&page=51&no=2297 http://blog.daum.net/rhfemflcl/2

My editing is based on official records and fact by K-League So This disscution is unnecessary and blocked User:Fetx2002's editing.

Sometimes unreasonable editing is accept on wikipedia. For example, 1+1 = 2 This an immutable truism. But on wikepedia, If the some people concluds that 1+1=3, 1+1=3 becomes truth on wikepdia,

If I do not attend discussion, Only User:Fetx2002 and ser:Fetx2002's friends attend discussion.

Probably Truth will be changed by Fetx2002's personal opinion

In conculsion, This discussion is not nessary. Please protect this article from Fetx2002's editing 13:45, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

I don't care about anything you guys have said. The teams should be in alphabetical order to prevent accusations of bias. There is no reason for Real Madrid to be listed before Barcelona in the El Clasico article, and there is no reason for Seoul to be listed after Suwon. Thanks. – Pee Jay 16:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I told a lie? Already known, but you are so rude. You are also FC Seoul supporter, and hate Suwon Bluewings. aren't you? You should think the name 'Super Match' has been used from when. 1996-2003, Suwon-Anyang's match called Jijidae derby. And Anayng location moved to Seoul, since 2004 Suwon-Seoul's match called 'Super Match'.--Fetx2002 (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fetx2002//I don't hate Suwon Samsung Bluewigns. I'm not interested in all about of Suwon Samsung Bluewings. You did vandal on FC Seoul article many times. But as you know, I never edited article of Suwon Samsung Bluewings.

If you don't vandal articles related to FC Seoul. I don't care your editing. Super Match called since 2008. During 2004-2007 There is no name. In your logic, All records counted since 2008? El clascio also don't counted sinse 1929. Becaus derby name El clascio didn' used in 1929.

What makes you think I am anything but neutral in this case? Is it only because I'm not picking your side? What reason do you have for putting Suwon first? – Pee Jay 21:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to tell you right now that if this conversation cannot remain civil you will be prohibited from editing this Wikipedia by the first admin that comes by. At which point your arguments will be moot and changes will occur to the article with out your participation. Please stick to the facts and the process. If you need arbitration you can seek that out. Mkdw ^talk 02:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you're not directing that statement at me. – Pee Jay 16:11, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]