Talk:Superman: Doomsday

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DCAU[edit]

why is this not part of the dcau? —Preceding unsigned comment added by divinevelocity (talk • contribs)

Sign your comments. If you can't take the time to add 4 tildes to your post, then people won't take the time to reply to you. And it's not part of it because apparently the writers decided it wasn't. Dlong 14:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And only discuss the article, not the article's subject. That's for message boards. Can't you feel the love?  ;) Ichormosquito 16:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone seen the movie yet? Supermike 8:13 19 Septembers 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.95.147 (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

trivia section[edit]

I removed the trivia section, since it only mentioned that Kevin Smith has a cameo, and that info appears earlier in the article anyway. Umbralcorax 15:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

removed:[edit]

I removed the following:

The absence of Superboy might be due to the lawsuit between the The Siegels and Time Warner, Although Director Bruce Timm did not mention this.

It seemed like OR to me, imho we'd need something to corroborate this. Umbralcorax 07:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little Mistake[edit]

The article says that Superman Returns was released the summer previous to Superman: Doomsday. This would mean that Superman Returns was released in summer 2007. It was released in 2006. Needs to be changed. --Bentonia School 16:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings section[edit]

This section has horrible grammar and is rather pointless. filmratings.com lists this film as "rated PG-13 for action violence". Isn't that all we need to know? Rpachico 04:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If someone could find some sources as to why they made the film more adult--making it receive the PG-13 rating--then I could see a point, given the fact that before then all the Superman animated films were PG. If not, then it's original research to imply there was meaning.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 04:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to the Comic[edit]

Please stop adding info that compares "dark superman" to elements of superboy/eradicator/cyborg in the Reign of the Supermen storyline. Unless someone can provide a source stating that was the intent of the writers, it's original research. Thanks. CPitt76 00:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedia article mentions Wonder Woman. During the Death of Superman storyline, Wonder Woman was marooned in space. She never had a chance to fight Doomsday during this story arc. She managed to fight the resurrected Doomsday years after the storyline had concluded and Superman had returned to full power. Doomsday did tear through the Justice League, but Wonder Woman was not part of it. Thanks. - Trevz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.97.113 (talk) 18:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It also says that Batman and the Justice League were omitted from the movie. Batman wasn't in the death of superman comic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.139.1.68 (talk) 16:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Titanic Battle.JPG[edit]

Image:Titanic Battle.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:1-on-1.jpg[edit]

Image:1-on-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Doomsday lifts Superman comparison.JPG[edit]

Image:Doomsday lifts Superman comparison.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Comics & Movie comparison.jpg[edit]

Image:Comics & Movie comparison.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DC movies are not connected[edit]

Having Justice Leauge in the followed by is wrong. There is no connection to any of the films outside of the being DC. By this logic Constantine is connected to V for Vendetta or Batman Begins.76.241.88.186 (talk) 05:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

However, they are connected within the same series of films, if not by continuity. For the article's sake, it's best to show the readers which films were released in progression of the series since there is no continuity between them. Since there is already a page for the line of the films which explains that they are standalone, there's no need to show continuity progression. --CmdrClow (talk) 01:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's not how the proceeded by and followed by are used. Like I said above Constantine & V for Vendetta are both made by Warner Bros. and are DC Vertigo movies, they are not connected.99.163.157.119 (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, see Template:Infobox_Film.99.163.157.119 (talk) 01:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The template says use these for a series of movies. Because the producers have called these a series, EVEN THOUGH THEY AREN'T CONNECTED BY CONTINUITY, they are still within the same franchise. --CmdrClow (talk) 08:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Sexual Innuendo'[edit]

I removed this sentence from the'Ratings' section ("Sexual innuendo is present (Lois kissing Luthor; Clark emerging from a bathroom wearing only a towel) but mild; this may have also contributed to the rating.[citation needed]") because not only is what it's describing not sexual innuendo, but scenes like this have appeared in plenty of films which recieved less than a PG-13 rating. Now, if there was a super-sized banana or someting conveniently placed in the bathroom for when he got out of the shower, that would be a different story... ;-) 86.147.99.81 (talk) 19:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Evil' clone?[edit]

Calling the clone evil is a bit harsh. OK, he took the law in his own hands and killed some bad guys, but except for Superman, he didn't try to harm anyone good. I'd say he's more misguided than evil. 65.43.96.3 (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image issues[edit]

The fair use of image:Warner Premier - Superman Doomsday screenshot.jpg in this article is questionable. Listed below is/are the reason(s) for this:
• Significance: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase, or its lack would significantly hinder, understanding the topic of the article. Full policy


Placed as a "and the scene looked like..." comment where the text sufficiently conveys the information.

If the above concern(s) can be addressed in light of the relevant policies and/or guidelines, the image use can be retained. If not, the image needs to be removed from the article.

The issue with Warner Premier - Superman Doomsday screenshot.jpg has been addressed.



The fair use of image:Death of Superman contrast.jpg in this article is questionable. Listed below is/are the reason(s) for this:
• Significance: Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase, or its lack would significantly hinder, understanding the topic of the article. Full policy


Placed without any context.

If the above concern(s) can be addressed in light of the relevant policies and/or guidelines, the image use can be retained. If not, the image needs to be removed from the article.

The issue with Death of Superman contrast.jpg has been addressed.


- J Greb (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed images - J Greb (talk) 22:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot section[edit]

Hi there, the plot section is far too long at 1141 words. The ideal length is 400–700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. I've never seen this movie, which makes it risky for me to start cutting. If any of you who are more familiar with the storyline can cut the cruft, that'd be great. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently watched the film, so I took a stab at cutting down the word count. Right now it's at about 980 words, I'm not quite sure on how to cut it even more. --Rfl0216 (talk) 19:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Superman: Doomsday. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Superman:_Doomsday&oldid=1210081869"