Talk:Supersingular isogeny key exchange

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 31 May 2014 by reviewer Chris troutman (talk · contribs).

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Carvalho1988 (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)--Jinbolin (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC) I looked at the article and checked the equations in the referenced paper. They seem correct to me.--Jinbolin (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bergsdorf23 (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Here is a reference which builds on the work of De Feo, Jao and Plut, "Toward quantum-resistant strong designated verifier signature"[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Authors:
Xi Sun - State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Networks, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China
Haibo Tian - School of Information Science and Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China
Yumin Wang - State Key Laboratory of Integrated Service Networks, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China

Published in:
Journal International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing archive
Volume 5 Issue 2, March 2014 Pages 80-86

Bergsdorf23 (talk) 19:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC) Reworked the introduction per instructions from editor. Made link to Post Quantum Cryptography clear.[reply]

Carvalho1988 (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Thanks for all of the work on the article Bergsdorf23. The introduction is much better. Hopefully the editors will find the new introduction sufficiently clear. Carvalho1988 (talk) 06:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CSIDH[edit]

Shouldn't this page mention CSIDH, which addresses some of the efficiency issues with SIDH? Eddywiki78 (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forward secrecy claim[edit]

Any public-key encryption scheme supports forward secrecy; this obviously includes constructions based on NTRU and RLWE. The practicality of this only depends on the cost of generating a fresh keypair for each connection, which is why it's much more popular to do this with DH rather than, say, RSA. 150.116.245.207 (talk) 09:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]