Talk:Supply-chain-management software

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems.

The listing of Supply chain management software vendors on Wikipedia[edit]

The following list of "Supply chain management software vendors on Wikipedia" has just been removed here

By User:Beetstra with the argument "this is not a see also, this is a vendors list, spammy, and hence removed". I think this list is not only spammy, but also rather POV... and maybe out of place. Shouldn't an article about Supply chain management software list mayor "Supply chain management software"? And if a list like that should be given, it should be based on reliable sources. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 00:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removed "an example" of software as it was clearly promotional. Why only one relatively unknown company gets this example without even being on Wikipedia? Ridiculous. 2601:1C0:CB01:2660:CC8F:C2A5:44FD:367C (talk) 01:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]