Talk:Susie Bootja Bootja Napaltjarri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSusie Bootja Bootja Napaltjarri has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 26, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Napaljarri artists include Biddy, Daisy, Susie, Kowai, Wentja, Peggy, Doris, Parara, Eileen, Louisa, Lucy, Helen, Linda, Kitty, Sheila, Valerie, Maggie, Topsy, Nora, Ada, Ngoia, Molly, Mona and Norah?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on January 16, 2018.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Susie Bootja Bootja Napaltjarri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: BelovedFreak 16:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Couple of issues, lead needs expanding
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    1 dead link
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Another interesting article. I actually started reading a bit more about Australian Aboriginal kinship this time, and found it fascinating. Here are my thoughts:

Lead[edit]

  • As per WP:LEAD, lead section is not currently summarising the whole article.
  • Does artist need to be linked?

Life[edit]

  • I think this opening sentence would be neater & slightly easier to read if it was done like Peggy Rockman Napaljarri, with a link to the notes section, giving the various year references. "Circa" already implies that it's not going to be exact, so I think it would be ok to just have one date there, and mention the other possibilities, with references, in the notes. What do you think?
  • I notice "skin name" is linked on its second mention - is that intentional?
  • Is there any information about her family or early life? I presume not because it's not mentioned, but anything more on that would be great if it comes to light anywhere.
  • Pretty sure i've squeezed the sources for all they are worth. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

  • Ref #4, National Gallery of Victoria, is not working
  • Awkward. They've just "improved" their website, as a consequence of which it appears, temporarily one hopes, to be stuffed. Search function not working, browse function not working. The page isn't archived at archive.org. If you don't mind i'm going to leave it as it is for now, and hope the NGV fix their site soon, at which point i'll get a new address. hamiltonstone (talk) 22:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not much to do here, I'll put it on hold.--BelovedFreak 16:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, good work, it's a pass!--BelovedFreak 11:47, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Susie Bootja Bootja Napaltjarri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:54, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]