Talk:Swanley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Civil parish[edit]

The original article didn't make clear the fact that the TOWN of Swanley is actually a civil parish and includes other settlements, including Swanley Village , which deserves its own article. It is two separate places. Peter Shearan 07:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising copy[edit]

This entire piece reads like an estate agents blurb. There are no references whatsoever does anyone fancy doing a major clean up? --ClemRutter (talk) 21:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of Swanley[edit]

This Wiki is inaccurate. I can't be arsed to change all of the mistakes in the text, but will point out the following:

Swanley is not mentioned in Domesday Book.

There is no clear evidence that the derivation of the placename Swanley is 'a clearing for pigs'. I am sure this fiction was invented by a history teacher at Swanley School sometime in the late 1960s as a backhanded insult towards the kids he or she was expected to teach. If Swanley was a Saxon name chances are it would have received mention in Domesday. It didn't. The name is just as likely to be derived from the personal name Sven, Svein or something similar.

The Wiki fails to mention that the original settlement of the town of Swanley (as opposed to modern-day Swanley Village) was based around Birchwood which does get mention in later medieval and early modern documents.

Swanley was never a major flower growing or orchard area (at least not more so than any other part of North Kent). It did however house a horticultural college (now moved to Wye near Ashford) which helped develop some modern flower and fruit varieties.

The A20 Swanley bypass was built in the mid 1960s not the 1970s.

The shopping centre that predated ASDA was built in the 1970s not the 1960s.

Swanley in Greater London[edit]

@217.205.204.10: The article has been amended to claim parts of Swanley are in Greater London. The parish of Swanley does not cross the Greater London boundary. So what exactly is claimed to be both part of Swanley and within Greater London? MRSC (talk) 09:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC) The rural area near Hockenden Lane, and by the Swanley By Pass. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.205.204.10 (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bus Info[edit]

Why remove the bus route info? Every other page has it. Very annoying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.65.158.64 (talk) 19:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Swanley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swanley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]