Talk:Swedish Match

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Swedish Match fact box[edit]

Key people: Robert Little (U.S. Snusking) should be removed. There is no Robert Little at Swedish Match. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.254.148.115 (talk) 08:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indented line Agreed, as "U.S. snusking" doesn't even seem to be a legitimate appellation.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Swedish Match. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Krueger era[edit]

This article has practically nothing on what is, by far, the most important part of the Swedish Match story. That is, the Krueger era when this was one of the most rapacious multinational corporations in the world. The lessons for today are many. It would be great if a knowledgable person could flesh that out some more! Phytism (talk) 12:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Swedish Match. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removed contentious material[edit]

I have updated key figures and other basic facts about the company.

While doing so, I noticed the "Controversies" topic that was added anonymously on 1 September 2020 regarding an issue involving the Maltese politician John Dalli. Only the first sentence had a source reference, and the source in question was a press release by the European Commission, which makes it non-independent relative to the topic.

Reading the John Dalli article and its talk page, it is clear that several topics related to Dalli are highly contentious, not least the one that was the focus of the recent addition to the Swedish Match article. In line with the principle that "contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion" (see WP:BLPRS), I have deleted the topic in question.

It is also worth mentioning that the topic seems to be rather peripheral with regard to Swedish Match, as neither the single source cited by the deleted text, nor the treatment of the same topic in the John Dalli article, seems to indicate any active involvement by the company beyond the reporting of a suspected corruption scheme to the European Commission. --OttoG (talk) 23:12, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]