Talk:Syntaxis
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Specific instances[edit]
Would Dickens count as reasonably syntactic? 81.152.162.106 (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Existence of "Syntaxis"[edit]
I can't find any evidence of syntaxis being what it's suggested to be. The definition of being a literary technique doesn't exist on Wiktionary either. And on top of that, I don't see how it's syntactically possible for there to be any third option after parataxis and hypotaxis. Sentences can either contain subordinate clauses (hypotaxis) or not (parataxis), I don't see how a third option could exist when it's pretty binary. Hrabnaz (talk) 22:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)