Talk:Systems architecture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Systems C‑class High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

Disambiguation[edit]

OK, so what sense of object should we be comfortable with? Are we referring to the philosophical sense of object (philosophy)? Are we just using the word for itself such that it should not be linked? I'm pretty sure that this does not refer to all the meanings on the dismbiguation page. My proposal at the moment is to remove the link entirely, and let it be just a regular word. Dpv 20:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That seems like a reasonable proposal. My reading of the sentence in question is that it is referring to hardware as well as software, which certainly makes a software-only interpretation nonsensical. I will make the change now. --Allan McInnes (talk) 21:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Systems architecture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517130043/http://www.acq.osd.mil/osjtf/termsdef.html to http://www.acq.osd.mil/osjtf/termsdef.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]