Talk:Szczurowa massacre

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article needs a map. Once the requested map is added, remove the `\|mapneeded=` parameter from this template.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

More information:
/
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: European / German / Polish / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	World War II task force

Romani people Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romani people, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romani people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Romani peopleWikipedia:WikiProject Romani peopleTemplate:WikiProject Romani peopleRomani people articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Poland may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Inclusion of the word Gypsy[edit]

Courtesy @GizzyCatBella: I want the word "Gypsy" to be removed from the article for several reasons. First is the most reasonable for me: short descriptions should "be short – no more than about 40 characters (but this can be slightly exceeded if necessary)" (WP:SDLENGTH; emphasis in original). We don't need include two synonyms there because it's redundant and increases the character count.

2. Gypsy is a slur.[1][2][3]

3. Even when used in a non-derogatory sense, readers don't need to know alternative names for something outside that thing's article. Wikipedia is marketed as an online encyclopedia, so people reading this can easily click on the link if they want to know some etymology or something.

It's late at night, so please excuse my grammar and tone, I'll copy-edit this later. ~~ lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 21:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lol1VNIO - That’s fine, thanks. I disagree with you so we need input of others to determine consensus. - GizzyCatBella🍁 22:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is slur, has to be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baro Shero (talk • contribs) 07:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has been moved to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Adakiko_using_ethnic_slur. ~~ lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 09:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For reference that discussion was closed with the suggestion of taking the discussion to Talk:Romani people. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 11:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The word adds nothing to the article, and the link to an unrelated source seems like SYNTH. Simpler opening to lede without the material in brackets and simpler short description, both saying "Romani" is cleaner. If readers don't know what "Romani" means they can go to the linked article. BobFromBrockley (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've made minor change to the target of the second link to the Romani people article. It wasn't made to influence this discussion, happy to see if reverted if anyone thinks it inappropriate. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this slur should be removed. People can click through to the Romani article if they need clarification. The term is also less exact as different traveller peoples, such as Irish travellers, are also called "gypsies". Lastly, "gypsy" is an English term so is uncontextual in this article and unrelated to German and Polish slurs/terms (which are variations of "cingane" with a different etymology). God knows we wouldn’t need a debate on usage of a slur in this way in an article about a Jewish pogrom or African-American lynching. Vladimir.copic (talk) 12:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the Romani people article is this a variant of English problem? It's doesn't appear to be considered a slur by all Romani and Wikipedia is more than just the US. Either way I believe the proper place for such a discussion is at Talk:Romani people, as it would set precedent for other articles. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 16:17, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a majority of editors in this discussion think this should be removed I’m going to remove it for now. Per WP:ONUS, it is on those seeking inclusion of disputed material to gain consensus for it. Vladimir.copic (talk) 21:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some readers, specifically older readers, need this clarification. Not everyone knows what Romani is. - GB Michalkiewicz (talk) 11:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GB Michalkiewicz: Mentioning the other name(s) is irrelevant for the article. This is unlikely the first Wikipedia article for many readers (and even unlikelier that it's the first time they see a hyperlink), so they should know that they can simply click on the link of words they don't understand. ~~ lol1 VNIO (I made a mistake? talk to me) 12:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GB Michalkiewicz --> Note - The consensus is to not retain the potentially offending word in the article. - GizzyCatBella🍁 14:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]