Talk:T.W.L/Yellow Pansy Street

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Start Assessment[edit]

I am completely baffled at the classification of this article. It was classified as a Start, then reclassified as C, then classified again as a Start article. Comparing this article to 'Start' class articles such as Gorillaz' 19-2000 proves that this article is definitely not a start class article. In contrast, the article for ARASHI's (Ashita no Kioku/Crazy Moon (Kimi wa Muteki) has been classified as a C class article and Kylie Minogue's All the Lovers has been classified as a B Class.

I am severely questioning whoever is assessing this article and want to know the reason as to why this article is considered to be a "Start Class" and not anything more. I am requesting that this article be reassessed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladymercury (talk • contribs) 05:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been assessed each time by User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars without any reasoning as to why.—Ryulong (琉竜) 14:46, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to ask Ryulong why the article is not worth a "C"-class rating. Based on the edit history of this talk page, you asked for a reassessment on April 15 after my initial start rating. I took a closer look and changed the assessment to a C. However, with this edit on May 19, Ryulong removed the C rating. My assumption was that this was an objection to the C, so I put it back as a start-class article because I believe every article should receive a rating. I agree it should be a C. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 14:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed the rating each time because Ladymercury contacted me privately to request insight on how to reassess the article, because she feels that it is not a Start or C class, and I was under the impression that removing the rating would be a means to properly have it reassessed.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:03, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To have the article reassessed, you should request assessment at the WikiProject Songs talk page. Otherwise, assessment is done by volunteers such as myself. To be a "B", the references must be valid and reliable and the citation style needs to be cleaner. I can't confirm the Japanese text citations and there seems to be issues with some of the references not being properly formatted. If Ladymercury thinks it is GA quality, that has a formal process to follow. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:56, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe that the article should be a GA quality. But I believe that article should be worthy of a B class, if not a C if there's minor issues. Though, in regards to the sources, if you can not confirm the Japanese pages, then how do you know if the sources are reliable or not? Have you taken the time to research and confirm that the said sources are official or not? If you can not read nor understand Japanese, should you not be assessing pages of Japanese music articles? " I can not read Japanese, thus I can not confirm if the source is reliable or not " is not really a valid justification for giving an article a Start Class rating (or retaliating by removing ratings). Just a question. --Ladymercury (talk) 23:38, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is a C-class article, which I agreed it was on April 17. Please see the edit history of this talk page. It can be a "C" without confirming the sources and that's what I assessed it at, but it was removed because Ryulong said you thought it deserved better than a "C". I didn't remove a rating (and I have no idea what you mean by retaliation), and there is no reason to remove the C rating unless someone else is willing to say it meets the criteria of a B-class article, which I cannot. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm restoring the C for now.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on T.W.L/Yellow Pansy Street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:T.W.L/Yellow_Pansy_Street&oldid=1223154837"