Talk:TV Genius

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TV Genius article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Tag[edit]

Please explain how the article requires a clean-up or fails to comply with NPOV, as the tag indicates. As the main contributor I have taken great care in how this article is presented. The problem is the tag is clearly aimed at people who write wikipedia articles badly, because they are inexperienced and thus the product needs cleaning up and trimming to accord with NPOV. I actually spend a lot of my time here clearing up others people's mess so I believe I can state this tag is inappropriate though there may be another tag you could replace it with. Thanks, ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 23:55, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As this is not being explained I will remove again this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.149.227.157 (talk) 17:30, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]