Talk:Tailhook scandal/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 21:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review[edit]

I plan to carry out the GA review on this LARGE article. Djmaschek (talk) 21:22, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Review 1[edit]

I carefully read the entire article and cannot find anything that would prevent it from being assessed as GA class, except the issues as listed below. Djmaschek (talk) 22:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns over behavior: 50-100 > 50–100 (use long dash).
Navy investigations and response, paragraph 3: "members of congress" (Congress should be capitalized).
Move Adm. Martin photo up to Concerns over behavior heading line.

Y All done. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passed GA class. Djmaschek (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hawkeye7: I did not know how to categorize this in the Good Articles list. So, I put it under Armies and military units/Other. Djmaschek (talk) 21:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]