Talk:Take My Wife (Family Guy)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Animation: Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group.

Note for Nominator[edit]

@AmericanAir88: Just wanted to let you know that IMDB is not a reliable source and will need to be replaced. I am also not sure what makes bubbleblabber.com. a reliable source to use on here either. Respectfully, I do not believe that this article is ready for GAN and I would recommend withdrawing it and working on the references before nominating it again. I would also see if there is any more information on the episode as there is not a lot of content in the article itself. Aoba47 (talk) 03:07, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Thank you so much for the input, After a second reading of the article I see the issues that address it. I nominated this article because many other Family Guy article have received the GA title and they have either less content or horrible references. The reviewers are blind to the article and only pass due to the show recognition. Thank you so much again for the input and I will continue to work on the article. AmericanAir88 (talk) 03:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response! If you see any article with the GA title that you feel needs reassessment, feel free to put it through the GAR process. It is unfortunate that some article get a pass due to something along the lines of name recognition. Good luck with your work on this. If you ever put this up for GAN again in the future, feel free to ping me and I will be more than happy to review. Aoba47 (talk) 03:20, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]