This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
The Gramaphone source actually goes to an article at the Boston Globe that doesn't seem to pertain to this link. I'm also concerned about Classial Lost and Found, as that appears to be a [[WP:SPS|self-published source and might not go through the type of editorial oversight that Wikipedia requires for its reliable sources. Not all sources are considered to be RS on Wikipedia, regardless of how good the sources might otherwise appear. It's frustrating, but the reason that SPS type sources like blogs aren't used is because there have been so many cases of people falsifying data on them in the past and because all things considering, it's not exceptionally difficult to open and run your own site, at least not from Wikipedia's point of view. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:51, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
