Talk:Tang Miao (footballer, born October 1990)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title Issue[edit]

Rather then having a long title with information that should be in the article, shouldn't the title name be "Tang Miao" rather then "Tang Miao (footballer born October 1990)"? --Flying Lambs (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 May 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Clear consensus against the move. (non-admin closure) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 01:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Tang Miao (footballer, born October 1990)Tang Miao – Primary topic over the other footballer in a WP:TWODABS situation; this footballer has played on the national team, played in another country (Singapore), and appeared in over 80 games in China's top league (Super league). The other Tang Miao, Tang Miao (footballer, born November 1990), only appeared in 1 game in the Super League and really has no notability beyond that, as he currently plays in China's 3rd division (keep in mind China is hardly a football powerhouse). --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Timmyshin (talk) 23:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose no urgency to disambiguate here, will only create confusion with the two zh.wp articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. --BDD (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - both relatively minor players, no clear PRIMARYTOPIC. GiantSnowman 14:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the aboves -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - no clear primary topic, October Tang is not really so significant a player in his own right. Fenix down (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.