Talk:Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture

	Australia portal Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

COI notice[edit]

Here's the supporting diff on that: User_talk:Liam Gash as of 22:54, 12 December 2010 OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 23:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright tag[edit]

The copyright tag applies to the lead section which is plagiarized from this site. My76 Strat 03:53, 13 December 2010 (UTC) It is not plagiarised. Saying that TIAR is a joint venture between ...." etc is a short statement of fact. How else do you suggest it should be said? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.217.6.8 (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Other discussions[edit]

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research and was previously (and still is) at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tasmanian Institute of Agricultural Research. Netalarm^talk 04:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Aside from COI, the institute is large, has been around for a while and been well covered in the media. If the article can be tidied up, it is likely to meet WP:GNG Clovis Sangrail (talk) 04:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the notability concern from the PROD. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 04:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PROD declined, since the primary issue was notability. I've also cleaned up the links and other promotional lines. Further cleanup needed. Netalarm^talk 04:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]