Talk:Teachings of Ellen G. White

Seventh-day Adventist Church High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

Sources[edit]

Note that Ellen White's writings themselves are a primary source for this article only, and should generally be avoided. Instead, secondary sources will consist of how others have described White's teachings. See the relevant policy section. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 01:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wish RobBertholf would know about this. This "Teachings" article is nothing more than a collection of primary material that is mostly already covered in the main article. It seeems we have a walled garden of White articles, all built on the same layout with the same excessive collections of links and promotional/non-neutral language, and all lacking proper secondary sourcing. There is no reason that her teaching, certainly in the way in which it is covered in here, can't be redirected to the main article, to Ellen_G._White#Major_teachings. Drmies (talk) 04:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For an article classified as high importance, a slash and burn method does not seem justified. @Rob talk 04:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Well. Maybe you should adjust that importance. There is no way in which that is justified. Rob, you really need a real argument. Drmies (talk) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I feel that we can work together on fixing any issues. If the article is to be redirected afterward, that is okay, but I would like the chance to fix these issues. @Rob talk 21:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trinitarianism[edit]

At best she never bothered discussing Trinitarianism. If she has ever explicitly endorsed it, it were easy to quote her having written so. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:11, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]