Talk:Technical intelligence

Military history: Intelligence / Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Espionage High‑importance

	Technical intelligence is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Direction of this article?[edit]

I came to this article after working on Farewell Dossier Since the Farewell Dossier dealt, depending on your point of view, with TI or S&TI, I thought it wise to update Technical Intelligence, so there was cross-reference to KGB Directorate T and Line X. Before I really knew it, I was wandering from S&TI to economic intelligence, a line easy to cross.

As I look at this article, it really addresses three related areas of intelligence:

Tactical technical
National-level scientific and technical
National-level economic

Can this be made to work, in its present form, as one article, or does it needs to split into two or three articles> If two, national level S&TI would go with economic intelligence, although things like trade negotiations and macroeconomics are things that are economic but not S&TI. There doesn't seem to be any great way to split up the topics, as all of these "output" areas -- TI, S&TI, economic intelligence -- all have collection, analysis, and, especially when deciding what to share with industry, dissemination issues.

I have avoided even thinking about FININT, which certainly affects economic intel.

Any thoughts are welcome.Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 03:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Technical intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080228183105/http://www.loyola.edu/dept/politics/intel/52001ph2.pdf to http://www.loyola.edu/dept/politics/intel/52001ph2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

I am trying to cleanup the text and format. Eventually, this might be two articles, one on Technical Intelligence and one on Scientific and Technical Intelligence. The terms are used interchangeably, so I await better referencing and cleanup to make a call on this. I have put a redirect on Scientific and technical intelligence for now. 18:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC) User:G._Moore Talk

After further review, I changed the rating to Start. It needs some images, better references, and less verbose content so that it is more factual. The text takes a tangent on economic intelligence that is not directly related to the primary subject. 14:39, 2 September 2019 (UTC) User:G._Moore talk