Talk:Technological sovereignty
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Technological sovereignty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Should this be merged with 'Network Sovereignty'?[edit]
Should this article be merged with Network sovereignty? This article is so short and it seems to make more sense to include this in the broader page. - Dyork (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- Yes I believe they should be merged. Data sovereignty, Digital Sovereignty, Network Sovereignty, Technological sovereignty. Which name is current, google all names to assess? They all have the same intent, what about Digital Sovereignty as the article? 12think (talk) 09:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
- Looked at this further, found comments like "Data sovereignty is a subset of "digital sovereignty" which refers “to the ability to have control over your own digital destiny – the data, hardware and software that you rely on and create”. Also there are references to Software Sovereignty, and Operational Sovereignty. Personally I believe the parent of all of these is Digital Sovereignty and these should be in one article as it is confusing to most people. --12think (talk) 23:45, 24 October 2023 (UTC)