Talk:Technopaganism

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Mid‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as High-importance).

I've expanded this entry a bit. I'd love to see more data and actual citations. Blade 16:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone believe this outside the fictional world of white wolf games? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.227.234 (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. However, I do not believe you exist. So I guess we are even. Blade (talk) 02:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, what? If someone who doesn't exist types something, does he not exist? Honestly... However, you must see that what he means by asking that question is that he thinks it sounds so (exuse me for not bothering to find a maybe less insulting word) odd, that he wonders how anyone could believe this. Of course someone believes this, if it has it's own article on wikipedia and a own SIG, somebody must believe this, since (exucuse me once again) wasting so much time on something you don't believe in would be utterly worthless. 81.235.40.42 (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)Yet another unsigned user from the depths of the internet[reply]

I think I can elaborate a little on this as a "neopagan". General speaking, the whole concept of "cities as spirits" isn't an unknown concept, and I do indeed know a person who practices some of the stuff in Penczak's(sp) "City Magic" work. Personally speaking, I can see the idea of the Internet attaining spiritual significance as a valid one and one that has merit if you think about how prevelent the Internet really is to everday life to a lot of people.TheStormofWar (talk) 22:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Technopaganism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081120211437/http://www.techgnosis.com/index_technopagans.html to http://www.techgnosis.com/index_technopagans.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:04, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]