Talk:Technophobia/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Hi, it's me again. This article did not address the points I raised in the last review, so I will re-iterate some of the points below:

Format references according to WP:CITE/ES. They must include the publisher and access date; this includes footnotes. I suggest using {{cite web}} to do this. The references that are not used inline are not really useful because they do not show which information they are referencing.
Expand the lead per WP:LEAD. The lead section should be a summary of the entire article rather than simply an introduction; right now, it is far too short.

Please address these issues and respond here to update me on its progress. Gary King (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A useful tool that eases the use of citation templates: [1]. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:06, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because there has been no response in seven days, this article has failed its Good article nomination. Gary King (talk) 04:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]