Talk:Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleTeenage Dream: The Complete Confection has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 13, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Mexican Certification[edit]

The album has been certified Platinum+Gold in mexico (here). Should this information be included in this article or the original Teenage Dream article? The official AMPROFON page shows the image of The Complete Confection. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 18:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:19, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How much does this article make sense to have?[edit]

It really is just encapsulated in the Teenage Dream era and isn’t separate enough from it. I feel like this album and a few other reissues don’t make sense to have on their own page. It’s not really even a reissue, it’s a deluxe edition with a unique name, that’s just my opinion though. I think it would do better just under Teenage Dream as one section in the article titled “Teenage Dream: The Complete Confection”. If someone can go in depth to explain it to me on why this has its own article, that’d be nice. 47.223.46.42 (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, this IS a reissue, one that has a somewhat different title along with new recordings. Aside from how containing all of its crucial information in the Teenage Dream would bloat that page, The Complete Confection here is covered by pieces specifically discussing that in detail (thus satisfying WP:GNG), plus the reissue got reviews, accolades, and chart peaks that aren't just from the original album. A separate page is therefore fully warranted. I oppose merging it into the other article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 06:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, I was just curious. Thanks for not being argumentative, I just wanted to know why. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.223.46.42 (talk) 07:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]