Talk:Telecommunications/Archive 2
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Unsorted text
Is there some destructive editing that is associated with my IP address that causes an automatic revert to the last version or does Curp see something wrong with my last edit? If there is something wrong with it please explain so that I may learn something if my edit provided incorrect information. Thanks. I'm going to try to save the page again just to see if it is automatic - if not and Curp is online and wishes to change it back please enter a comment in the discussion for the page.
- Why do you keep intentionally adding the nonsensical
[[[[Link title]][[Link title]]]](especially the last edit ?) -- Curps 10:13, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
- Not intentional - I hit the Internal Hyperlink button a couple of times when the cursor wasn't in the edit box but I thought that it didn't enter anything, since I had to click into the edit box to get it to insert the Hyperlink that I wanted...I'll look at my edit again and see if I can see what you mean. Thanks
- OK, I found it - I guess it adds the [[Link title]] to the bottom of the page if the cursor is not in the edit box when you hit the Internal Hyperlink button. I'll have to watch that in the future. Thanks
- I also found an adverse reference to the IP address that is visible to the Internet when I am doing an edit- the reference is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:216.166.159.185 and I have added a comment to that page notifying anyone who is interested that this IP address belongs to one of my ISP's servers and my IP address is NAT'd by that server so it may show up from any one of a number of individual users, some of whom may be doing some destructive editing. Thanks
- OK, I found it - I guess it adds the [[Link title]] to the bottom of the page if the cursor is not in the edit box when you hit the Internal Hyperlink button. I'll have to watch that in the future. Thanks
aesthetic appearance of article
Okay, this is really rather silly, but the article looks weird to me, as "telecommunication" is repeated too many times in the first paragraph. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 04:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)