Philosophy: Metaphysics / Logic Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Logic

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Macwhiz, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on September 11, 2010.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

WikiProject Time assessment rating comment[edit]

Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 07:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the relation of temporal parts and events[edit]

I would like something more on the relationship between temporal parts and events. Who identitfied perduring objects with events? And maybe some reference to why perduring objects are not events and why it is wrong to identify objects with events.

--RickardV 10:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary Intrinsics[edit]

This should either be relocated to the section on perdurantism, or alternatively put into a section on its own. Ideally, one would imagine this page should entirely be about what temporal parts are, as opposed to arguments for their existence (i.e. arguments that perdurantism is true). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.7.108 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it got moved into its own section at some point. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]