Talk:Texas A&M University–Central Texas

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Texas A&M University–Central Texas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:50, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive "Administration" section[edit]

An unregistered editor is insisting that this article include an extensive listing of all of the university senior administrators including their previous positions and some of their biographical details. This is clearly unnecessary and unwelcome information in this encyclopedia article. ElKevbo (talk) 02:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elkevbo is taking a significant amount of biased and subjective interpretation of his command for higher education and limiting information of how the young university is guided by highly tenured and prolific scholars to ensure the university succeeds. In the future, the information may be limited when the university is more tenured itself. But unless he takes down administrative guidance for all universities in the U.S., he is biased towards specific universities for no apparent reason - as also indicated by others in his own talk space. If he continues to take down the administrative information, he is creating an adversarial position in the higher education community. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.175.21.168 (talk) 02:29, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've cited two important documents of Wikipedia practice; please address them. Simply because a university is "young" is no reason to include irrelevant information in an encyclopedia article. You have not presented any reason why this information is critical for readers to know nor why we should make an exception for this institution. We don't include this information in other articles. If you find counterexamples, please let us know because those articles probably need to be edited. ElKevbo (talk) 03:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]