Talk:Texas Instruments DaVinci

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I hope this doesn't sound too much like an ad. I don't work for TI but I do like what they've done with this. DImfeld 07:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MPEG-4 Encoding[edit]

Is this chip fast enough to do MPEG-4 encoding? --65.70.89.241 13:37, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. The DSP is more than powerful enough to do MPEG-4 in real-time. I've seen a demo with it encoding and decoding H.264 in real-time, although the demo wasn't at HD resolution. I'm not sure what the maximum bitrate is that this can handle with H.264; I suppose it partly depends on what else the chip is doing. -- DImfeld 07:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can it do general-purpose data processing?[edit]

This info is hard to find, so I figure I give it a shot asking here (and then the answer could be added to the article). So here it goes: how specialized is DaVinci's DSP? Is it totally geared for video/multimedia, or it can be programmed to do things like processing data from an ADC at, say, 200 megasamples/s, namely: detecting trigger, downsampling, convolution of data, FFT, storing data in memory at full rate and then processing and displaying under control of OS running on ARM9, etc? 24.87.3.133 06:15, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, seems like the C64x+ DSP core does not have enough I/O throughput. -- 24.87.3.133 05:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Written like an advertisement[edit]

The whole article reads like an advertisement, perhaps it might be a good idea to either add more content that is referenced from non-TI material or mark everything that looks like non-encyclopedic material and re-write it or remove it. I have watchlisted the talk page, and I will see what I can change and mention it here. CpX41 (talk) 13:19, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]