Talk:The 5th National Council of Bangladesh Nationalist Party

Daily Star Poll Findings

What a particular newspaper finds out in their online poll usually does not reflect the opinion of an impressive number of people, thus it does not appear to be a mandatory mention at a primary source of information like Wikipedia. Still Daily Star is assumed to be a popular newspaper and there should be something to do with what they found out in their online poll, the findings can be attached at the bottom with external links, as it has been done now. TawsifSalam 13:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

New Paragraph for Criticism

Instead of describing 'all possible information' in the introduction, a specific paragraph has been put there where criticisms have been described. TawsifSalam 17:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

But lines about serious criticisms against the council like empowering Khaleda Zia and his son and also allowing war criminals to join BNP should be on the introduction. Souvik.arko (talk) 05:49, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Repeated editions over the introduction are appearing to be considered as deliberate vandalism over the article with influence of assumed political bias. It's unfortunate that a contributor having the 'member of AVU' tag supports and commits such act.

There has already been opened a section Reactions and certain criticisms from different mass-accepted bodies can be set there, even with a new heading "Criticism" if someone suggests. But repeatedly mentioning the criticisms almost at the bottom of the article even-though there exists suitable paragraph for its placement, hints at deliberation to demonize the subject of this article, which as per Wikipedia shouldn't be considered as acceptable. Thank you. TawsifSalam 10:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

My brother i think u lack the knowledge of what vandalism is and is not..hope u enjoy the vandalism article and think twice before accusing someone for political bias only by assuming. Re-adding info that has been removed (only because someone doesn't like it) is not called vandalism. And...i see your contribution list suggests that you are interested ( most of the time) only in articles that are some how related to a particular political party only ;) u should edit other articles too.

this article didn't meet the wikipedia NPOV standards when I read it for the first time and had the partial tone as there was no mentioning about the strong criticisms the BNP council received in the country. then every time i added some criticisms (with source) that the BNP 5th council has received you have either undid my edits or manipulated the lines in such ways that can only be reffered to as sneaky vandalism which i did not expect from a contributor who is listed in so many Wiki projects. so it's expected u maintain NPOV and have respect for other contributors. thank you. Souvik.arko (talk) 12:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Repeated editions over the introduction are appearing to be considered as deliberate vandalism over the article with influence of assumed political bias. It's unfortunate that a contributor having the 'member of AVU' tag supports and commits such act.

u deleted the above boxed text from ur comments ..why ? i'm re-adding them. 12:56, 12 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Souvik.arko (talk • contribs)

Your idea of taking suggestions about oneself entirely from contribution list seems interesting. TawsifSalam 13:58, 12 December 2009 (UTC)