Jump to content

Talk:The Baby Show

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Baby Show has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Baby Show is part of the 30 Rock season 1 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 22, 2010Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Baby Show (30 Rock)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Staxringold talkcontribs 20:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Couple things
  • "It was written by co-executive producer Jack Burditt, and directed by Michael Engler." No comma needed.
  • Is/Was Katrina Bowden, Lutz, and Keith Powell guest stars? Cerie and Lutz played lesser roles in the first season, but it's hard for me not to see Powell as a main cast member. I see that Screenrush doesn't list them as main cast members,
    • They didn't get star billing until season two, so with season one they were guest stars.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • Should this have a cultural references section? Some of these have them, some don't.
    • Only if something cultural is being referenced.
  • Shouldn't this article make some mention of how it starts off one of Liz's largest overarching stories (wanting a baby) that lasts all the way to the third season in Do-Over?
    • Do you think so?
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  3. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    As with the earlier review, could use a screenshot, can take one if you want.
    If you got one, it'll be a big help.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for a couple things.

Thanks for the review. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Baby Show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]