Talk:The Best Man Wins (1910 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Best Man Wins (1910 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 20:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Time for another review

Production

  • "that Thanhouser would have in this first year of productions." Not too sure what you mean by "in this first year of productions" Do you mean "in its first year of productions"?

Release and reception

  • "The Moving Picture World found the story to be interesting and well acted, giving no criticism of the production." I noticed there is no source at the end of this sentence.
  • "The New York Dramatic Mirror's review criticized the weak plot and the satisfactory acting which was diminished by camera consciousness." Noticed that camera consciousness is a red link. Can it be linked to something else?
  • "No known extant copies of the work are known to exist." Suggest rewriting to: "No known existing copies of the film are known to exist."

References

  • Link the publishers of these sources.

Categories

  • Add this film to the lost films category.

Going to place on hold for now. good888 (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good888 Fixes done. Thanks for reviewing. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh and just to clarify - "camera consciousness" does not have an article, but it will likely get one. I cannot find an article that basically covers films showing actors having an awareness of the camera in a scholarly sense, someone will hopefully make one on Wiki. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:15, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Once again well done and thanks for clarifying. Promoting to good article class. good888 (talk) 10:54, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]