Talk:The Boat Race 1926/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 17:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's been, ooh a week since I reviewed a boat race, so I'll do this one Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:30, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

Might be worth mentioning that it was Cambridge's third win in a row?
Ya, gone and done that. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Background[edit]

"Cambridge opted to arrive a fortnight later than usual at Henley" - what does this mean exactly? There's no other context to put "Henley" in
Ok, have replaced Henley with the Thames. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crew[edit]

"Cambridge's number six J. B. Bell hailed from Australia" - wouldn't "was" be easier than "hailed" (or even was Australian)?
Re-worded... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Race[edit]

"Following a series of spurts" - I'm sure "spurts" was linked in other Boat Race articles to something, but I can't remember what
No, I'm not sure it was, but I vaguely remember the discussion. Let me know if you can find it and how to fix it up for you if it's still an issue... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

Nobody sank. Boooooring. On hold. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:36, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know, the sinking happen relatively infrequently. Sorry about that. Perhaps a more Total Wipeout approach to the Boat Race will catch on, especially if Bernie Ecclestone gets his claws on it.... Thanks, I've one outstanding comment above.... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the "spurts" comment, it might have just been a silly joke or Martinevans123 bait .... anyway in either case I don't believe it affects the GA criteria, so I'll pass this now. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:22, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]