Talk:The Bourne Supremacy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Should take you to the movie, not book[edit]

Searching Bourne Supremacy should take you to the movie page, not the book. I know it was obviously a book first, but people are far more familiar with the movie.--65.244.150.2 12:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I don't agree. What criteria dictates that films take precedence over the novels on wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.168.39.167 (talk) 04:47, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

Plot summary[edit]

We shouldn't be repeating the plot of the first book, should we ?

The rest of the "summary" needs editing and rephrasing. -- Beardo (talk) 01:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Similarity to the movie.[edit]

I've read the book, after enjoying the film. It's ridiculous to claim the two have entirely different plots, as is currently the case with the article. The film is clearly based loosely on the book, with several identifiable elements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mongoletsi (talkcontribs) 22:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem, apologies. I was referring to The Bourne Identity, ooops. Mongoletsi (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]