A fact from The Burton Cooper appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Beer, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Beer, Brewery, and Pub related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BeerWikipedia:WikiProject BeerTemplate:WikiProject BeerBeer articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.
Map needed
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in England may be able to help!
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 17:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1:... that The Burton Cooper(pictured) shows a hole in his apron, traditional for coopers in the town? "the artist made sure his depiction was accurate, right down to the traditional hole in a Burton cooper's apron" from the same source
ALT2:... that James Butler studied coopers at Bass-Charrington for his 1977 work The Burton Cooper(pictured)? "observing the work of the coopers Erdie Lee and Joe Foster at Bass, photographing them and then making preliminary models" from the same source
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 14:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Looks GTG to me. In terms of the article itself, it is new enough (created 17 Dec 2020, nom 19 Dec 2020), long enough (4230 chars readable prose), and within policy (refs/tone OK, no CLOP detected by automated/manual checks). In terms of the hook, it is within guidelines, interesting enough and supported by the refs in the source/nom. In terms of the other typical DYK considerations, the QPQ expectation is covered, and there are no image issues. Otherwise, while the "background" section of the article was a little broad, I think this is GTG as it (now) is. With the primary proposed hook. Guliolopez (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
Looks GTG to me. In terms of the article itself, it is new enough (created 17 Dec 2020, nom 19 Dec 2020), long enough (4230 chars readable prose), and within policy (refs/tone OK, no CLOP detected by automated/manual checks). In terms of the hook, it is within guidelines, interesting enough and supported by the refs in the source/nom. In terms of the other typical DYK considerations, the QPQ expectation is covered, and there are no image issues. Otherwise, while the "background" section of the article was a little broad, I think this is GTG as it (now) is. With the primary proposed hook. Guliolopez (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)