Talk:The Case of the Animals versus Man/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 08:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Very cool article! I will review over the weekend. --Cerebellum (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
My comments:
- Lead:
is an epistle written by the Brethren of Purity
I recommendis an Arabic epistle
so readers who don't know who the Brethren of Purity are can quickly place the article in context. - For the second paragraph of Plot, I'm not sure including the Arabic translations of each animal name adds anything. I recommend removing them.
- Images: Only one image, fair use rationale provided.
- References: Spot checks conducted for #6, 8, and 21. No issues identified, I could not access the other sources.
- The article reminded me of medieval debate poetry and Drakht-i Asurig, you could add those to the see also section if you would like.
Other than that I cannot think of anything you should do to improve the article, it is comprehensive and makes great use of a wide range of sources. Well done, I'm happy to pass as GA. Sorry I don't have more for you. If you are looking for extra work to do, I suppose this should have a place in list of rasa'il in the Encyclopedia of the Brethren of Purity ;) --Cerebellum (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)