Talk:The Chaplin Revue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleThe Chaplin Revue was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 29, 2007Good article nomineeListed
October 30, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 3, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Charles Chaplin decided the best way to bring The Tramp (pictured) into the new era was by re-releasing three silent films he made with First National as a feature-length film?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Well done. Garinus 06:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment[edit]

i know the article is by and large decent but the lead is really rather short. Chensiyuan 06:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

do you mean to say "compilation" in the first line of the lead? Chensiyuan 07:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • extended the lead - will do some more later when im not so busy.. have also traded 'compliation' for a better phrase LordRobert 07:18, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]