Talk:The Concept of Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Untitled[edit]

the 'main ideas' found in the book is found (i.e. repeated) too in the entry on HLA hart. Chensiyuan 08:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the reference to Saint Lazare who is an entirely unimportant and unrecognizable name in the field. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.191.184.109 (talk) 08:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This book is humorous. Because morality and law should never be separated. Essentially this book is an ironic essay on how the law itself demonstrates to be criminally incompetent. Separating morality from law is also grounds for dictatorship. Gosh, the 1960's were very bad. Yes, I know this is not a forum. Deal with it. Please don't erase this because you feel it is within your right. You are not helping. ....SandwitchHawk.... (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I like this article.[edit]

I haven't read The Concept of Law or watched YouTube videos explicating the book; but, I really like the layout of this article. The section on Hart's empirical realism was done nicely. Good job!

SpicyMemes123 (talk) 10:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]