Talk:The Girl Reporter

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Girl Reporter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Another GA sweep JAGUAR  21:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD

   Nothing on the Production in the lead, despite the section being scarce the lead must summarise

   "The film follows two sweethearts" - a bit informal? How about "lovers"

   "The film was also shown by the Province Theatre of Vancouver, British Columbia in Canada" - better to shorten to Vancouver, Canada or British Columbia

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another part of the 1910 sweep done JAGUAR  15:06, 3 June 2015 (UTC)