Talk:The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Not sure how one can threaten someone with damnation... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.213.244.78 (talk) 02:25, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By saying "you will burn in hell" and similar fairytale scare stories. 85.234.65.51 (talk) 14:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We can say whatever we will brother, we cannot threaten damnation for we are not the ones who deliver damnation.

We are the diagnosers, not the Surgeon.

He wrote the prescription, we merely read the prescription. And He resolves the prescription.

See you may think you got hand trouble from gambling, lip trouble, from all the cussing and profanity you utter, or eye problem for all the filthy things you look at but Dr. Law will let you know it's all heart trouble. You need a new heart, lucky for you one has already been provided, the most blessed, sinless heart ever to grace the shores of man, freely bestowed. You're sick unto death and need a full heart transplant, Dr. Grace does the cutting.

We cannot 'threaten damnation' nor has any Christian ever tried, he could not be a Christian.

If we say "You'll die in trespasses and sin", we are not the ones that do the killing, you do. If we say you'll fall into hell then are we threatening you with hell? If you're driving along a road, you come up to a river crossing and the bridge's out, and a man says "Watch out, you're gonna drive into the river"

Is he threatening you with drowning? Think about it brother. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.30.23 (talk) 04:34, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undo[edit]

The following conversation was taken from my user:talk page here [1]. I am reposting because I think the confusion with Facebook may arise again in the future.

Someone more familiar with the programme will have to remove the plot you wrote if it is wrong. On the other hand, I know that[2] was something you copied from Facebook [3]. —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 03:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Err...no. The Facebook page you link to clearly states, "From Wikipedia." They copied me, not vice versa. I would appreciate it if you restored my work. 63.3.5.3 (talk) 09:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you copied them or they copied you is not the issue. The issue is you and they are each other's sources. If you want your work restored, use the undo feature, like you used it on my other edits. —This lousy T-shirt (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I believe it is the issue, for two reasons. First, you accused me of copying them. Second, your statement "you and they are each other's sources" is nonsense. Either they were written at the same time, in which case neither is the source, or they weren't, in which case one, not both, is the source. (Unless you are advocating some sort of time travel, which sounds fascinating but fictional.) I wrote original content for Wikipedia and someone on Facebook copied me; I am the source and you have not shown otherwise. Since you are not willing to undo what is obviously your mistake, I will do it for you.63.3.5.2 (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: By "neither is the source," I of course meant "neither is the source of each other," not "neither is original content." Yeesh. My logic is sound, but my clumsy-ass phrasing is not helping my case. I've wasted too much time on this already; I will now back away from the computer.63.3.5.130 (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]